Comparing In-House Receptionists vs. Answering Services: What’s Best for Your Business?

Infosearch provides exceptional answering services for Global businesses. Outsource answering services to Infosearch and enjoy 24x7 customer service for your business.   

It is thus necessary for any business to make a decision as to whether they hire their own receptionists to attend to the calls or contract a service to do the same. Here's a comparison to help you make an informed decision:

In-House Receptionists:

Pros:

1. Direct Integration: Previous research evidence also emphasised that in-house receptionists are employed within the organisational physical setting of the business making a quick reference to organisational data and undertaking business amidst the business entity. This can result in getting acquainted with the business and the environment it operates within to a great extent.

2. Personalized Service: The in-house receptionists also have an excellent opportunity to familiarize themselves with the staff members and the clients hence the regular calls are from people that they know.

3. Full-Time Availability: While recruiting and training their in-house receptionists, they are accessible to employees and visitors during the business organization’s working hours.

Cons:

1. Limited Availability: In-house receptionists may not be available when business hours for an organization are over, therefore; there are losses in missed calls as customers will be put off.

2. Cost: The major disadvantage of having direct employees to serve as receptionists is that they are costly to employ and retain in their positions in the aspect of remuneration, employee benefits and training costs among others.

Outsourced Answering Services:

Pros:

1. 24/7 Availability: Answering services can be furnished to offer round-the-clock services where all the calls being received shall be attended and the customers, in particular, be served even during evenings or at night.

2. Cost-Effectiveness: Third-party answering service providers are cheaper than full-time receptionists since business people can agree to pay for calls answered as per the calls answered or for a fixed amount overall.

3. Scalability: There is nothing complex in managing the call volume since answering services are very flexible and can immediately increase or decrease their support in a particular period or correspondingly to the needs of the business.

Cons:

1. Limited Knowledge: Relative to in-house receptionists, answering service agents might not be very much acquainted with the business and therefore, callers are likely to have less personalized interaction with service agents.

2. Potential Communication Challenges: While outsourced agents have already undergone several pieces of training, they may not deliver the business’s values or even particular information passed on to them to the customers and are therefore likely to be inconsistent in their interfacing with the customers.

Finally, it is vital to note that the usefulness of receptionist services in your office or workplace depends on the priorities and preferences of your commercial activity. If you want direct integration within your business environment, this is done personally and you have a relatively steady call volume during working operation hours, then perhaps inside operators are the optimal solution. However, if goals such as cost-efficiency, availability around the clock, and the capacity to increase the number of clients is crucial, then it is better to employ the services of an answering service. Some businesses also sojourn opt for a middle ground, where they have an internal receptionist and also hire answering services for additional hours.